Skip to main content

20th Annual Finance Conference at WashU

November 14 – 15, 2024

Registrations are closed

20th Annual Finance Conference at WashU

 November 14-15, 2024

Sponsored by:

The Wells Fargo Advisors Center for Finance and Accounting Research 

 

WashU Olin Business and its Wells Fargo Advisors Center for Finance and Accounting Research (WFA-CFAR) cordially invite you to attend the 20th Annual Finance Conference at WashU, November 14-15, 2024.

We look forward to seeing you at the conference!

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

Hong Liu

Asaf Manela (co-chair)

Mark P. Taylor

Anjan Thakor

Margarita Tsoutsoura (co-chair)

 

Details

Start: November 14, 2024
End: November 15, 2024
Olin Business School at Washington University in Saint Louis

Charles F. Knight Executive Education & Conference Center, Snow Way Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA

Snow Way Drive 1
63130 St. Louis MO
United States

Keynote Speaker

Anjan Thakor

John E. Simon Professor of Finance, and Director of the WFA CFAR
Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis

Presenters

Antonio Gargano

Associate Professor of Finance
C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston
  • sites.google.com
  • Antonio Gargano

    Set it and Forget it: Engineering Investment Habits with FinTech

    We study how automated investment rules aect saving behavior and investment outcomes using detailed data from a FinTech app designed to help small investors access mutual funds. Users choose how to design these rules, which vary along dimensions such as frequency, amount, and triggering conditions. Using a randomized encouragement design, we show that automated rules causally increase average savings without crowding out manual contributions. We also show that automated rules reduce trend-chasing.

    Read more

Tristan Fitzgerald

Assistant Professor of Finance
Mays Business School, Texas A&M University
  • mays.tamu.edu
  • Tristan Fitzgerald

    How do VCs (actually) make decisions? Internal evidence from a private startup accelerator

    Using a proprietary dataset detailing all startup applications, all internal judging scores and judges’ written comments, all signed financing contracts, and even all audio recordings of interviews and contract negotiations involving one of the largest venture capital-backed startup accelerators in the United States, we open the ‘black box’ of venture capital (VC) decision-making. We first study the entire internal VC investment selection process by examining the key determinants of judging scores from initial screening through to final portfolio firm decisions. For example, by focusing on how individual VC partners/employees evaluate the same potential portfolio firm, we provide novel evidence on the existence of significant VC judge-founder ‘homophily’ biases and detail how different judging settings (e.g., solo vs. group evaluations; availability of quantitative vs. qualitative information) can amplify or mitigate such biases. Second, we document the value implications of adopting different judging policies and scoring aggregation rules (e.g., consensus vs. champion-based decision rules) for VC fund performance. Finally, we are the first to empirically document the key features of a recent innovation in startup firm financial contracting instruments (namely Simple Agreement for Future Equity (SAFE) and Keep It Simple Security (KISS) contracts) and investigate their relationship with startup firm characteristics and internal VC evaluations. We offer novel insights into the role of a salient ‘anchor’ or ‘reference point’ in setting future equity pricing terms as well as the importance of startup financial constraints in VC term sheet negotiations.

    Read more

Meghan Esson

Assistant Professor, Finance
Tippie College of Business, The University of Iowa
  • sites.google.com
  • Meghan Esson

    Price Regulation and Cream-Skimming: How Private Equity Competes with Government-Backed Firms

    We examine how private equity (PE) firms generate value in markets where prices are regulated and do not reflect costs.  Using novel data from Arizona's ambulance industry, we find PE-owned companies increase operating profits by 50\% through cream-skimming: strategically exploiting regulations, and avoiding minimum service requirements, to shift unprofitable customers to the government while retaining high-profit customers. In the ambulance industry, they accomplish this by firing paramedics, which, due to nationwide staffing regulations, forces local fire departments to take high-cost runs. This strategic reallocation only occurs where PE firms overlap with fire departments, which allows them to avoid minimum timing requirements. This impacts public health -- leading to 200 additional traffic fatalities in Arizona and a 7\% increase nationally. Our findings demonstrate how PE profit maximization in mixed public-private markets can create substantial negative externalities for both public balance sheets and public health.

    Read more

Gen Li

Finance Ph.D. Candidate
Sauder School of Business, The University of British Columbia
  • www.gen-li.com
  • Gen Li

    Monetary Policy and Housing Duration: Evidence from Reaching-for-Income Investors

    Fixed-income theory posits that longer-duration bonds are more sensitive to interest rate changes, and many assume this principle extends to other assets. Contrary to this view, I document a striking inversion in housing markets: shorter-duration properties exhibit greater sensitivity to monetary policy changes. I construct a novel zip-code–level measure of housing duration based on Macaulay duration, showing that shorter duration corresponds to higher rental yields. On average, a 100 basis-point cut in the federal funds rate raises house prices by 1.86 percent over two years, but markets with durations one standard deviation shorter experience an additional 0.71-percentage-point increase—about 38 percent of the average response. Using 30 million property transaction records combined with rental listings, I confirm the inverse duration–sensitivity relationship at the property level. The property-level evidence shows that the inversion is driven by the discount-rate channel through “reaching-for-income” investors. After rate cuts, income-seeking investors disproportionately target high-yield properties for rental purposes and prioritize near-term income over long-run returns. Their demand raises local prices and lowers discount rates more in short- than long-duration markets, generating a non-parallel shift in the housing term structure. Overall, the paper highlights an investor-driven channel in which rental-income preferences shape monetary policy transmission heterogeneity across housing markets.

    Read more

Julia Fonseca

Associate Professor of Finance
Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • www.juliafonseca.com
  • Julia Fonseca

    The Effects of Deleting Medical Debt from Consumer Credit Reports

    One in seven Americans carry medical debt, with $88 billion reported on consumer credit reports. In April 2023, the three major credit bureaus stopped reporting medical debts below $500. We study the effects of this information deletion on consumer credit scores, credit limits and utilization, repayment behavior, and payday borrowing. Contrary to expectations that removing this negative credit information would improve credit access for affected individuals, a regression discontinuity analysis comparing individuals above and below the $500 threshold finds no direct benefits from the information deletion, ruling out small changes. To help interpret these findings, we build credit scoring models using machine learning techniques and show that small medical debts are not meaningfully predictive of defaults, indicating that they contribute little to credit risk assessment. Finally, we show that larger medical debts (>= $500) are also not meaningfully predictive of default, suggesting that eliminating medical debts entirely from credit reports, as planned under a January 2025 decision by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is unlikely to affect credit outcomes.

    Read more

Alessandro Melone

Assistant Professor of Finance
Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University
  • fisher.osu.edu
  • Alessandro Melone

    The Pricing of Geopolitical Tensions over a Century

    We study the asset pricing implications of geopolitical tensions using nearly 100 years of data. Leveraging widely adopted news-based geopolitical risk indices, we find that geopolitical threats (GPT) and acts (GPA) have markedly different effects. GPT aligns closely with investors’ risk perceptions from ratings and surveys and predicts long-run consumption disasters. It is priced across individual US stocks, equity anomalies, and international equity and bond indices. GPT also captures time variation in country-level equity premia and firm investment. In contrast, GPA exhibits weaker and less stable links to risk perceptions, risk premia, and investment. We demonstrate that these findings are consistent with an Epstein-Zin investor facing time-varying disaster probabilities. Importantly, our results are incremental to news-based risk indices capturing war-related discourse, market volatility, economic and trade policy, and general macro-financial uncertainty. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of forward-looking measures like GPT for understanding how news-based uncertainty affects asset prices.

    Read more

Yunzhi Hu

Associate Professor of Finance
Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu
  • Yunzhi Hu

    Financial Flexibility under Financing Constraints and Non-Exclusive Lending

    This paper examines optimal financial flexibility for firms under financing constraints and nonexclusive lending. We develop a model in which a borrower requires funding for an initial investment and seeks additional financing later following a privately observed liquidity shock. Non-exclusivity creates incentives to dilute initial debt, leading to excessive total borrowing. The optimal contract is an endogenous debt limit: firms with mild shocks retain flexibility but over-borrow (relative to second-best), while those with severe shocks face binding constraints and under-borrow. This limit optimally trades off debt dilution against liquidity needs.

    Read more

Daniel Neuhann

Assistant Professor of Finance
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin
  • danielneuhann.com
  • Daniel Neuhann

    A Trilemma for Asset Demand Estimation

    This paper establishes theoretical limits to identifying asset demand from observational data. We show a trilemma: one cannot simultaneously maintain that (i) prices respect no-arbitrage, (ii) investors care about asset payoffs, and (iii) asset-level demand elasticities can be recovered from supply shocks to individual assets. The trilemma can be resolved only if the econometrician observes at least as many independent quasi-experiments as the dimensionality of the asset span, or else relies on theoretical assumptions that cannot be tested with data. These results provide clear guidance for credible empirical design in asset demand estimation.

    Read more

Sean Myers

Assistant Professor of Finance
The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania
  • www.sean-myers.net
  • Sean Myers

    The Subjective Belief Factor

    Subjective expectations and asset prices both revolve around distorted probabilities. Subjective expectations are expectations under biased probabilities, and asset prices are expectations under risk-neutral probabilities. Given this link, asset pricing techniques designed to estimate a Stochastic Discount Factor (SDF) can be used to estimate a Subjective Belief Factor (SBF) – a distortion that characterizes many subjective expectations, even for non-financial variables. Further, the Subjective Belief Factor can be used to characterize asset prices, by separating the roles of beliefs and preferences/risk. Using the Survey of Professional Forecasters and Blue Chip, we find that differences between subjective expectations and statistical expectations for 24 macroeconomic variables can be summarized (average R-squared of 50%) by a single SBF related to real GDP growth and the T-bill rate. This SBF accurately replicates differences across the 24 variables in the serial correlation of forecast errors and under/overreaction. Applying this SBF to cross-sectional stock returns, we find it accounts for the majority of excess returns for the Fama-French factors and explains about two thirds of the variation in returns across 176 anomalies, while the remaining third is attributed to preferences/risk. Our results support models like diagnostic expectations and robust control in which agents' beliefs across different variables are characterized by a single probability distortion.

    Read more

Abhishek Bhardwaj

Assistant Professor of Finance
Freeman School of Business, Tulane University
  • freeman.tulane.edu
  • Abhishek Bhardwaj

    Does Fund Size Affect Private Equity Performance? Evidence from Donations to Private Universities

    Do private equity (PE) returns rise or fall with fund scale? A causal effect is difficult to identify because better managers can raise larger funds. We develop an instrument using donations to universities. Donations affect fund size because endowments are sensitive to donation income, have sticky relationships with PE managers, and signal fund quality to other Limited Partner investors. We show decreasing returns to scale: a 1% size increase in fund size reduces net IRR by 0.1 percentage points. Larger funds do larger deals, which underperform.  We find no change in risk, in part because additional deals are more levered.

    Read more

Discussants

Michaela Pagel

Associate Professor of Finance
Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis

Yakshup Chopra

Assistant Professor of Finance
Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami

Maarten Meeuwis

Assistant Professor of Finance
Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis

Cyrus Aghamolla

Associate Professor of Accounting
Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University

Vladimir Mukharlyamov

Assistant Professor of Finance
McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University

David Sovich

Ashland Oil Assistant Professor of Finance
Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky

Isaac Hacamo

Associate Professor of Finance
Kelley School of Business, ​Indiana University

William Cassidy

Assistant Professor of Finance
Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis

Fenghua Song

Associate Professor of Finance
Smeal College of Business, Penn State University

Andrew Ellul

Professor of Finance and Fred T. Greene Chair in Finance
Kelley School of Business, Indiana University

Papers

Asset Embeddings

Xavier GabaixRalph S. J. KoijenRobert RichmondMotohiro Yogo

Firm characteristics are ubiquitously used in economics. These characteristics are often based on readily-available information such as accounting data, but those reflect only a part of investors’ information set. We show that useful information about firm characteristics is embedded in investors’ holdings data and, via market clearing, in prices, returns, and trading data. Based on insights from the recent artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) literature, in which unstructured data (e.g., words or speech) are represented as continuous vectors in a potentially high-dimensional space, we propose to learn asset embeddings from investors’ holdings data. Indeed, just as documents arrange words that can be used to uncover word structures via embeddings, investors organize assets in portfolios that can be used to uncover firm characteristics that investors deem important via asset embeddings. This broad theme provides a natural bridge to connect recent advances in the fields of AI and ML to finance and economics. Specifically, we show how language models, including transformer models that feature prominently in large language models such as BERT and GPT, can handle numerical information, and in particular holdings data to estimate asset embeddings. We provide initial evidence on the value added of asset embeddings through a series of applications in the con- text of firm valuations, return comovement, and uncovering asset substitution patterns. As a by-product, the models generate investor embeddings, which can be used to measure investor similarity. We propose a programmatic list of potential applications of asset and investor em- beddings to finance and economics more generally.

Contract Completeness of Company Bylaws and Entrepreneurial Success

Paul Beaumont, Johan Hombert, and Adrien Matray

Does reducing the cost for entrepreneurs to write more complete contracts with their financiers enhance entrepreneurial success? To shed light on this question, this paper exploits a 2008 French reform that made it less costly for new firms to choose a legal form allowing more complete financial contracts in the company bylaws. Using comprehensive tax-filing data from 2004 to 2015, we find a marked increase in the adoption of that legal form among new firms, leading to higher growth in capital, labor, and revenues in the first three years after creation. The effects are more pronounced for firms with high marginal returns to capital, suggesting that capital misallocation decreases. Our findings highlight the significant role of legal and financial structures in entrepreneurial success, which has policy implications for promoting entrepreneurship.

Entrepreneur Experience and Success: Causal Evidence from Immigration Wait Lines

Abhinav Gupta, Franklin Qian, and Yifan Sun

This paper investigates the causal impact of entrepreneurs' prior experience on startup success. Employing within-country changes in Green Card wait lines to instrument for immigrant first-time entrepreneurs' experience, we uncover that startups led by more experienced founders demonstrate superior funding, patenting, and employee growth. Specifically, each additional year of founder experience leads to a 0.7 p.p. (1 p.p.) increase in the likelihood of a startup undergoing an IPO (growing to over 1000 employees), over the subsequent decade. The larger initial team size, facilitated by the improved ability to recruit former colleagues, explains the observed startup success. Our findings imply that each extra year of experience is worth $200,000, underscoring a critical consideration for policymakers in the design of startup incubators.

Expected EPS x Trailing P/E

Itzhak Ben-David and Alex Chinco

When an analyst includes a price target in their earnings report, they are required to explain exactly how they calculated this one-year-ahead forecast. We read through these explanations to understand how analysts price their own subjective cash-flow expectations. Contrary to what textbooks assume, most do not apply present-value reasoning. Instead, they typically multiply a company’s expected earnings per share (EPS) times its trailing price-to-earnings ratio (P/E). We outline a simple model where this mostly backward-looking approach is correct on average because prices themselves are mostly backward-looking. When we reexamine the data, we find trailing P/E ratios explain both analysts’ price targets and realized future returns exactly as predicted by our model.

When Private Firms Provide Public Goods: The Allocation of CSR Spending

Kim Fe Cramer, Lucie Gadenne, and Noémie Pinardon-Touati

This paper studies how firms allocate their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) spending to shed light on the potential social effects of corporate contributions to public goods. We do so using a novel dataset covering the universe of the CSR expenditures of Indian firms over the period 2015-2019, which includes detailed information on the projects and social causes firms invest in. Using textual analysis methods, we construct an index of the technological proximity of firms’ industries to social causes to capture the extent to which firms use their production processes for CSR projects. Preliminary results suggest that firms do spend more on causes they have a comparative advantage in, in line with the theoretical literature on the desirability of CSR (Besley and Ghatak, 2007; Hart and Zingales, 2017). However, firms tend to spend in geographic areas where social returns are relatively low.

Fund Flows and Income Risk of Fund Managers

Xiao Cen, Winston Wei Dou, Leonid Kogan, and Wei Wu

We develop a unique dataset, the first-ever of its kind, by leveraging the US Census Bureau’s LEHD program and various big textual data sources, to examine the factors influencing the compensation and career trajectories of US active equity mutual fund managers. We find that managers’ compensation is primarily determined by assets under management (AUM), with return performance directly influencing bonuses beyond its impact on AUM. Despite not aligning with client interests, fund flows significantly affect manager compensation and career outcomes. Large fund outflows increase a manager’s likelihood of job turnover (with a substantial decline in compensation) by 4 percentage points.

Taxation when markets are not competitive: Evidence from a loan tax

Felipe Brugués and Rebecca De Simone

We study the interaction of market structure and tax-and-subsidy strategies utilizing pass-through estimates from the unexpected introduction of a loan tax in Ecuador, a quantitative model, and a comprehensive commercial-loan dataset. Our model generalizes bank competition theories, including Bertrand-Nash competition, credit rationing, and joint-maximization. While we find the loan tax is distortionary, neglecting the possibility of non-competitive lending inflates estimated tax deadweight loss by 80% because non-competitive banks internalize some of the burden. Conversely, subsidies are less effective in non-competitive settings. If competition were stronger, tax revenue would be 10\% lower. Findings suggest policymakers consider market structure in tax-and-subsidy strategies.

The Economics of Market-Based Deposit Insurance

Edward T. Kim, Shohini Kundu, and Amiyatosh Purnanandam

We examine the financial stability implications of deposit insurance using a recent financial innovation: reciprocal deposits. Banks can significantly increase deposit insurance coverage through the reciprocal deposit network, where they break up large deposits and place them with other banks in an offsetting manner. With close to half a trillion dollars in outstanding contracts under this arrangement, reciprocal deposits have become an important source of funding for the U.S. banking sector. Using network presence as an instrument, we show that enhanced insurance coverage allowed banks to retain deposits following the 2023 banking crisis. Network banks pay lower interest rates on their deposits, indicating depositors’ willingness to accept lower rates for higher insurance access. Enhanced coverage also has implications for competition and bank risk-taking; we find evidence that network banks grow larger and increase their exposure to interest rate risk.

The Subjective Risk and Return Expectations of Institutional Investors

Spencer J. Couts, Andrei S. Goncalves, and Johnathan A. Loudis

We use the long-term Capital Market Assumptions of major asset managers and institutional investor consultants from 1987 to 2022 to provide three stylized facts about their subjective risk and return expectations on 19 asset classes. First, there is a strong and positive subjective risk-return tradeoff, with most of the variability in subjective expected returns due to variability in subjective risk premia (compensation for market beta) as opposed to subjective alphas. Second, belief variation and the positive risk-return tradeoff are both stronger across asset classes than across institutions. And third, the subjective expected returns of these institutions predict subsequent realized returns across asset classes and over time. Taken together, our findings imply that models with subjective beliefs should reflect a risk-return tradeoff. Additionally, accounting for this subjective risk-return tradeoff when modeling multiple asset classes is even more important than incorporating average belief distortions or belief heterogeneity in our setting.

Unlocking Mortgage Lock-In: Evidence From a Spatial Housing Ladder Model

Julia Fonseca, Lu Liu, and Pierre Mabille

U.S. mortgage borrowers are “locked in”: unwilling to sell their house and move, as that would require giving up low fixed-rate mortgage rates for high current rates. This paper studies the general equilibrium effects of mortgage lock-in on house prices, mobility, and homeownership and evaluates policies aimed at unlocking mortgage lock-in. To do so, we design a spatial housing ladder model that captures moving patterns across different housing market segments. Households can move between locations differing in economic opportunity and cost of living, and within the housing ladder by deciding whether to rent, own a starter home, or own a trade-up home. In equilibrium, house prices and rents are endogenously determined by household mobility within and between locations, and are thus impacted by lock-in. We provide new empirical evidence on moving behavior along the housing ladder and over the life cycle and calibrate the model with rich microdata from 2024. Despite also reducing housing demand, we show that the net ef- fect of mortgage lock-in is a negative shock to housing supply, which increases house prices and thus creates inflationary pressure. We further evaluate the equilibrium effects of the proposed 2024 Mortgage Relief Credit, which would provide a $10,000 subsidy to sellers of starter homes. We find that the policy modestly increases first-time home buying and has larger effects on upward mobility at the top of the housing ladder. The upward mobility within the housing ladder comes at the cost of renters and starter homeowners moving from high- to low-opportunity areas, as house prices in higher-priced areas increase.

PhD Poster Session

PhD Poser Session Presenters: 

Philip Coyle, University of Wisconsin - Madison  "Maturity Walls"

Mohit Desai, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill  "What Drives Bank Credit Lines? Wholesale Funding and Bank Liquidity Creation"

Jianzhang Lin, Emory University  "Creditor’s Rights, Household Consumption, and Entrepreneurial Activity"

Federico Mainardi, The University of Chicago "The Impact of Fiscal Policy on Financial Institutions, Asset Prices, and Household Behavior"

Namrata Narain, Harvard University  "How Patient is Venture Capital?"

Artem Streltsov, Cornell University "Generating Exposures with Large Language Models: Insights into M&A Activity"

Stefan Walz, Columbia University "Monetary Policy Complementarity: Bank Regulation and Interest Rates"

Local Hotel Information

Charles F. Knight Center (located on campus, connected to conference center)
GPS: Throop Drive & Snow Way Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130. Phone: (314) 933-9400

A block of rooms have been reserved for conference guests. Thursday, NOVEMBER 14th FULL. Book directly using this link: Group rate for the 20th Annual Finance Conference at WashU

Le Méridien St. Louis Clayton (located near campus, negotiated conference rate)

Approximately 1.7 miles from the Charles F. Knight Center/Washington University campus.

7730 Bonhomme Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63105.  Phone: (314) 863-0400. 

A block of rooms have been reserved for conference guests. Book directly using this link: Book your group rate for WashU Finance Conference Room Block

Clayton Plaza Hotel

Approximately 1.4 miles from the Charles F. Knight Center/Washington University campus.

7750 Carondelet Ave, Clayton, MO 63105.  Phone: (314) 726-5400. 

The Ritz-Carlton, Clayton
Approximately 1 mile from the Charles F. Knight Center/Washington University Campus. 

100 Carondelet Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63105. Phone: (314) 863-6300

Moonrise Hotel
Approximatley 1 mile from the Charles F. Knight Center/Washington University Campus. 

University City Loop 6177 Delmar Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63112. Phone: (314) 721-1111

AC Hotel St. Louis Central West End 

Approximately 2.9 miles from the Charles F. Knight Center/Washington University campus.

215 York Ave, St. Louis, MO 63108. Phone: (314) 887-4849